Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Email: ITI Comments on First Public Working Draft of W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0 (8 - 3rd Party Content) #450

Open
jspellman opened this issue Mar 11, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
migration: core Issues that raise core questions that are still open for discussion section: conformance Deals with conformance aspect of Silver Subgroup: Conformance Options survey : ready for proposal or issue response is ready for group review

Comments

@jspellman
Copy link
Contributor

Comment from Email:
from PDF

Explicit treatment of, and allowance(s) for, a broad range of 3rd party content including:

  • Content not owned by the website owner (e.g., movies, ads, maps, etc.) where copyright restrictions or license agreements may prevent the website owner from changing the content to make it accessible.
  • Content shared by individual website visitors (e.g. comments, blog posts, social media posts, recorded media). While a website may offer authors (visitors) the ability to submit accessible content, we are concerned with the impact of holding sites accountable by requiring visitors to submit content through an accessibility assessment and remediation pass (e.g., having to put ALT text on every image they contribute; having to meet language simplicity rules for readers with print/cognitive impairments). Doing so places a burden of specialized knowledge on the part of content contributors, and so could result in contributors “gaming the system”, such as adding garbage ALT text to pass the content posting requirement. It could also lead to a large drop in content sharing.
@jspellman jspellman added section: conformance Deals with conformance aspect of Silver status: assigned to subgroup ask subgroup for proposal Subgroup: Conformance Options labels Mar 11, 2021
@JaninaSajka
Copy link

JaninaSajka commented Dec 10, 2021

DRAFT RESPONSE: The updated WCAG 3 Working Draft just published contains Sec.
6.2: User Generated Content
which
responds to your second bullet in your comment. We solicit and welcome your
response to this first iteration of proposed conformance criteria relating to
user generated content even as we continue to bring additional third party
guidance into future WCAG 3 Working Drafts.

We are still in active discussion on your first bullet.

@jspellman jspellman added survey : ready for proposal or issue response is ready for group review and removed status: assigned to subgroup ask subgroup for proposal labels Dec 16, 2021
@rachaelbradley rachaelbradley added the migration: core Issues that raise core questions that are still open for discussion label Aug 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
migration: core Issues that raise core questions that are still open for discussion section: conformance Deals with conformance aspect of Silver Subgroup: Conformance Options survey : ready for proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants