Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More explicitly document use cases #1389

Closed
equalsJeffH opened this issue Mar 18, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

More explicitly document use cases #1389

equalsJeffH opened this issue Mar 18, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
@Risk Items that are at risk for L3 type:editorial
Milestone

Comments

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

We need to provide more specific guidance for RPs about how to configure the several options for navigator.credentials.{create,get} and, secondly, to provide a reserve mapping of options back to intents.

See PR #1300

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor Author

equalsJeffH commented Jun 10, 2020

@agl summarily closed PR #1300, with the nominal suggestion to simply cite https://github.com/balfanz/how-to-fido (i.e., whenever/wherever it morphs into a more "official" document). We certainly ought to cite the latter. However, though, readers may suffer impedance mismatches between what is presently in the WebAuthn spec and the latter document unless the present webauthn scenarios section(s) are appropriately massaged (at least some?) --- we should probably at least take a look and see if we feel that may be the case.

In any case, I've removed the pr-open label from this issue for the time being.

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor Author

i think we should do something along these lines, but it can be addressed in a milestone later than wd-03

@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH added the stat:puntable Issue or PR that is candidate to move to a later milestone label Jul 1, 2020
@nadalin nadalin removed the stat:puntable Issue or PR that is candidate to move to a later milestone label Jul 21, 2020
@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH added the stat:puntable Issue or PR that is candidate to move to a later milestone label Oct 13, 2020
@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor Author

see also the closed PR #1300
this is a nice-to-have and puntable to a later spec version -- doing this properly is not "hard", but will take effort. I envison something like revamping along the lines of pr#1300, but also citing https://github.com/fido-alliance/how-to-fido/blob/master/HowToFIDO.md for "the full details"
see also issue #334

@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH modified the milestones: L2-WD-04 Final, L2-CR Nov 11, 2020
@wseltzer wseltzer modified the milestones: L2-CR, L3-WD-01 Feb 18, 2021
@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH removed the stat:puntable Issue or PR that is candidate to move to a later milestone label Mar 17, 2021
@nadalin nadalin added the @Risk Items that are at risk for L3 label Jun 27, 2023
@timcappalli
Copy link
Member

This is a bit dated now after the How to FIDO work that then morphed into passkeys.dev

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
@Risk Items that are at risk for L3 type:editorial
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants