Learn about your responsibilities as a Microsoft supplier

Read the Microsoft Supplier Code of Conduct (SCoC) to review how our values, integrity, honesty, and compliance extend throughout the supplier ecosystem.

About the Supplier Code of Conduct (SCoC)

At Microsoft, we have the tremendous opportunity to work with thousands of suppliers in over 100 countries across the globe. We rely on these suppliers every day to support our mission of empowering every person and organization on the planet to achieve more - and realize their full potential. Our partnership is more than building innovative technology and delivering solutions that transform the way we live - it's about our values, who we are as a company and individuals, and how we manage our businesses while working together.

We require suppliers to be aware of, attest to, train on, and always adhere to the SCoC. The SCoC and training focus on:

  • Doing business ethically when it comes to anti-corruption, conflicts of interest, hiring practices, human rights, and honesty in business and corporate recording
  • Demonstrating respect and inclusion - ensuring accessibility, the ability to raise workplace concerns, and share our climate and environmental commitments
  • Protecting information, data, and Intellectual Property rights
  • And of course, ensuring privacy rules and regulations are met for all 

Thank you – to our Microsoft suppliers for your continued collaboration and hard work - helping ensure Microsoft runs on trust.


Supplier Code of Conduct training

Microsoft expects suppliers to act ethically and with integrity. Suppliers demonstrate this commitment by complying with our Supplier Code of Conduct and ensuring that their eligible employees and subcontractors are trained annually on the SCoC.

Annual supplier managed training requirements:

  • On an annual basis, an authorized representative from the supplier must review and acknowledge the SCoC, and complete the Microsoft SCoC training course. Confirmation of this must be attested to annually in Microsoft’s SupplierWeb platform.
  • Suppliers are required to train eligible employees and subcontractors working on Microsoft matters annually on the content of the SCoC.

In addition to Supplier’s training obligations noted above, all external staff requiring access credentials to the Microsoft corporate network and/or buildings are required to complete SCoC training before they obtain their access rights. This training will be managed and provided by Microsoft.

For more information on the SCoC training requirements, review the training requirements FAQs.


FAQs

Select a tab below to learn more information in each section:

Environmental protection

|

The purpose of the Minamata Convention is to protect human health and the environment from anthropogenic emissions and releases of mercury and mercury compounds.

The Stockholm Agreement on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs Agreement) is a global treaty to protect human health and the environment from chemicals that remain intact in the environment for long periods, become widely distributed geographically, accumulate in the fatty tissue of humans and wildlife, and have harmful impacts on human health or on the environment.

The Basel Convention is an international treaty designed to reduce the movements of hazardous waste between nations, and specifically to prevent transfer of hazardous waste from developed to less developed countries (LDCs).

To help achieve the company’s broader sustainability goals, Microsoft has implemented additional sustainability requirements for suppliers. The following language was added to our Supplier Code of Conduct in 2020 to require our suppliers to disclose and reduce their greenhouse gas emissions:

 

Suppliers must disclose complete, consistent, and accurate scope 1, 2 and 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data and/or components required to calculate GHG emissions data, via CDP or an alternative method identified by Microsoft. Suppliers may also be required to provide independent or third-party assurance over such disclosed emissions data. Suppliers must also provide and achieve plans to reduce absolute GHG emissions by a minimum of 55% by 2030 or an alternative reduction target pursuant to the baseline established in their supplier contract or in other written communication with Microsoft. Specific requirements for data disclosure, assurance, reduction targets, and achievement of planned reductions, including the timing of Supplier conformance, will be set forth in their supplier contract or in other written communication with Microsoft.

 

By sharing clear reduction requirements and harmonizing the asks we and other large buyers are making of our suppliers, we aim to send a strong collective market signal. We have harmonized our requirements to align with those of leading industry groups such as the Exponential Roadmap Initiative, in order to avoid compliance burden to suppliers.

Reducing GHG emissions to limit climate change in line with a 1.5-degree Celsius pathway is a global imperative for everyone. The best available science indicates that every organization needs to do even more in far less time than previously thought. As outlined in our January 2020 sustainability announcement, Microsoft is committed to becoming carbon negative (removing more carbon out of the atmosphere than the company emits) by 2030. To achieve this goal, we must continue to engage with our suppliers and build on existing efforts to track and reduce our Scope 3 emissions, which contribute a majority of Microsoft’s overall emissions. Our policies are designed to achieve these goals in partnership with our suppliers.

In the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, GHG emissions are organized into three categories, or “scopes”:

  • Scope 1 covers all direct GHG emissions caused by sources owned or controlled directly by your company, (for example, emissions from combustion in owned or controlled boilers, furnaces, vehicles, etc. or emissions from chemical production in owned or controlled process equipment.)

  • Scope 2 covers indirect GHG emissions caused by the generation of energy purchased by your company, such as electricity, steam, and heating/cooling.

  • Scope 3 covers all other indirect emissions not included in Scope 2 that occur in the value chain of your company both upstream and downstream, (for example, emissions generated by your suppliers during production or your customers during their use of your products.)

 

In most cases, Scope 3 emissions represent the vast majority of a company’s total GHG emissions, which is why it is critical to include in corporate emissions reduction targets.

Microsoft follows the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. While we do not require specific methodologies be followed, we do require our suppliers to report complete, consistent, and accurate data.

Yes. During our feedback sessions, we heard from suppliers that a lot of existing resources are quite technical. As such, we have developed some introductory sustainability learning resources designed to help our suppliers measure and report their GHG emissions, develop clean energy strategies and reduce their energy-related emissions. These are available publicly on Tools and resources - Microsoft sustainability

 Additional GHG accounting resources: 

Additional GHG reduction resources: 

 

Learn about The Climate Group’s RE100, EP100, EV100 and SteelZero programs

Yes. Microsoft is partnering with the International Finance Corporation (IFC), a sister organization to the World Bank, which will work with qualifying Microsoft suppliers in emerging markets, to identify technical solutions reducing GHG emissions, provide implementation assistance and offer financing solutions to help them make investments in more efficient and low-carbon operations.  

 

Learn more about our partnership with IFC 

 

Additionally, our Climate Innovation Fund has committed to investing $1 billion over four years into new carbon emissions reduction technologies. 

  

We’ll focus our funding on investments primarily based on four criteria: (1) strategies that have the prospect of driving meaningful decarbonization, climate resilience, or other sustainability impact; (2) additional market impact in accelerating current and potential solutions; (3) relevance to Microsoft by creating technologies we can use to address our unpaid climate debt and future emissions; and (4) consideration of climate equity, including for developing economies. 

  

Learn more about the Climate Innovation Fund

We heard from suppliers that measuring, reporting, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions require a great deal of time and expertise, especially for organizations new to the process.  We therefore intend to take a phased approach in rolling out these disclosure and reduction requirements to our suppliers. 

 

As such, your company’s specific requirements for emissions data disclosure, assurance, reduction targets, and achievement of planned reductions, including the timing of conformance, will be set forth in your supplier contract or in other written communication with Microsoft.* 

  

*If, prior to July 2020, you were contractually required by Microsoft to submit your carbon emissions, then you will need to continue to meet any deadlines relevant to your contract.

Raising integrity concerns

To report questionable behavior or a possible violation of the Supplier Code of Conduct